120 film is a type of medium format roll film. It is widely used in still photography. It was released by the famous photography brand Kodak in 1901. It had to be a response to the popularity of larger formats offered by competitors [1].
The number “120” refers to the width of the film in millimeters. The film is wound on a spool that allows it to be used in both sheet-fed and roll-film cameras. In Europe, these dimensions are known as the “6 cm format”. Lomography sells rebranded 120 films from other manufacturers under its own name.
220 film is also a type of medium format roll film, but it was introduced later, in 1965. It offers twice the number of exposures as 120 films [2].
The number “220” refers to the width of the film in millimeters. The term “medium format” can refer to either the 220 film size or the corresponding negative size. Negatives using 220 films are 56 mm wide by 54 mm tall. It is a standard ratio for most consumer snapshot cameras is 4 perforations per frame. It results in an aspect ratio of approximately three-to-two.
In terms of cost, 120 films are pricier than 220 films. This happens because the 120 film type has been around for longer and there is more demand for this particular format.
- World’s finest grain high-speed color negative film
- Ideal for scanning with extraordinary enlargement capability
- Beautiful, natural skin tones and superb color reproduction
- Optimized sharpness and distinct edges with fine detail
120 Film: Key Facts
In terms of quality, 120 films are considered to be better than 220 films. 120 films typically produce larger negatives, which results in a slightly better image quality.
If you’re just starting out with medium format photography, then 120 film might be the best option for you. This is because it’s more affordable and easier to find.
Due to the fact that the film plane is larger on medium format cameras, you have more area to isolate your subject in a relatively thin slice of focus. In such a way you may blur the foreground/background and make the photo appear almost 3D [4].
Medium format is best suited for professional uses, and it’s almost a must-have for anyone who wants to use film in their professional workflow (weddings, portraits, etc.).
However, even if you’re not a professional photographer, the medium format can still be a great way to get into film photography. The initial investment might be higher, but the results are definitely worth it!
120 mm film is still accessible for sale in a range of film stocks. And even despite the fact that it has been discontinued. It may be acquired online and from camera dealers with ease.
120 film is still quite popular today. It happened due to the recent success of the Holga camera with 120 film.
Still, photographs were most commonly shot on 120 films during this decade, although box cameras and other inexpensive photographic equipment were used as well. As a result of the popularity of 35mm film, 120 films became widespread among professional photographers as a medium for recording images [5].
The main advantage of 220 film is that it provides twice the number of exposures as 120 film. In other words, you can get twice as many photos out of a single roll!
Another advantage of 220 film is that it’s slightly cheaper than 120 film.
220 Film: Key Facts
The 220 film offers the same width as the 120 film type. However, it offers the double length (144 cm) for this media format.
Also, keep in mind that it has no backing paper behind the film like there was in 120 [6].
Some professional cameras may use both 120 and 220 films. These devices have a 2-position pressure plate adjustment. Look for various switches on your device to change the format, however, it is not always possible. Some modern types of photo cameras will require distinct film backs to handle the various film types in different situations [7].
It was designed for professional photographers. With a 220 roll, they would be able to take double the amount of photographs before having to replace the film, as opposed to a roll of 120 [8].
Otherwise, 220 mm film should be used with “newer” devices – more professional cameras that can shoot in different conditions.
This film stock is more prone to fogged edges if it isn’t laminated. Another disadvantage is that finding a lab that will develop the film may be difficult or expensive.
There was a brief time when 220 film was no longer accessible.
Despite its disadvantages, 220 film remains a popular choice for many photographers. Its main advantage is that it provides twice the number of exposures as 120 film, which is great for anyone who takes a lot of pictures or who doesn’t want to waste time reloading their camera.
120 and 220 Films: The Camera Compatibility
Both film types may be used on smaller-format cameras with replaceable film backs (including the Mamiya RB67).
On Hasselblad cameras, the 120 and 220 film backs are not interchangeable because the 220 back is slightly larger to allow for double-length film.
While some Holga cameras can be modified to use both types of film, most cannot. The Diana F+ camera can also use both types of film with its special “half-frame” mask.
Major Differences Between 220mm and 120mm Films
So, what are the main differences between these two types of film? Let’s take a closer look:
Size
The first difference between 120 and 220 films is size. 120 film is 60mm wide, while 220 film is 84mm wide. This means that images on 220 films will be slightly larger than those on 120 films.
Number of Exposures
As mentioned before, 120 films offer 12 exposures per roll, while 220 films offer 24. This makes 220 films ideal for situations where you’ll be taking multiple pictures, such as events or weddings.
Cost
Another difference between these two types of film is cost. 120 films typically cost more than 220 films. This is because 120 films are more popular and in demand.
Availability
120 films are more widely available than 220 films. This is due to the fact that they have been around for longer and are more popular. You should be able to find them at most major camera stores.
220 films, on the other hand, can be harder to find. But you can probably order them online if you can’t find them in the store.
That’s pretty much the main difference between these two types of film: 220 film has double the number of exposures as 120 film. Other than that, they’re both essentially the same thing.
Some facts about common and popular media formats – 120 or 220 formats [9]:
- 120 film is 60mm wide and typically provides 12 or 20 exposures per roll;
- 220 film is twice as long as 120 film (220mm vs. 120mm) and provides 24 or 36 exposures per roll;
- Both types of film may be used on smaller-format cameras with replaceable film backs. All medium format cameras launched in the late 1980s through the early 1990s should be able to use 220;
It might take some time to locate and collect 120 and 220 backs in excellent shape. Many were utilized by expert photographers, who have subjected them to considerable strain. Backs for 220 are more difficult to find than those for 120. Even less common is the Polaroid Film Back, which can be used with both types of film.
Many cameras can take both 120 and 220 films, as well as the Mamiya and Pentax 67 [10].
If you need more exposure, then 220 film is the way to go. But if cost is a factor, then 120 films may be the better option. Whichever you choose, just make sure that you are getting the results that you want.
Whichever type of film you choose, make sure you get familiar with the loading and unloading process before you head out on your next shoot.
If you use film like a professional, read the following articles:
120 vs. 220 Film: Comparison Table
This table compares the main differences between 120 and 220 film formats commonly used in photography. Both 120 and 220 films are medium format films, but they have distinct characteristics that photographers need to consider when choosing the right format for their projects.
Indicator | 120 Film | 220 Film |
---|---|---|
Number of Frames | 12 frames per roll | 24 frames per roll |
Roll Length | 30.5 cm (12 inches) | 61 meters (200 feet) |
Availability | Widely available | Discontinued |
Backing Paper Color | Usually white | Usually clear |
Spool Configuration | Backed with a single paper spool | Backed with two paper spools |
Frame Number Markings | Marked every frame | Marked every other frame |
Explanation:
- Number of Frames: 120 film typically contains 12 frames per roll, while 220 film contains 24 frames per roll. This difference in frame count affects the total number of photographs that can be taken with each type of film.
- Roll Length: 120 film is wound on a spool with a length of approximately 30.5 cm (12 inches). In contrast, 220 film comes in a much longer roll, with a length of around 61 meters (200 feet).
- Availability: As of the knowledge cutoff date in September 2021, 220 film has been discontinued by major manufacturers, making 120 film the more readily available option for photographers.
- Backing Paper Color: The backing paper of 120 film is typically white, which can make it easier for photographers to identify the frame numbers. On the other hand, 220 film usually has a clear backing paper.
- Spool Configuration: 120 film is backed with a single paper spool, while 220 film is backed with two paper spools to accommodate the longer roll.
- Frame Number Markings: 120 film has frame number markings on every frame, making it convenient for photographers to know how many shots they have taken. In contrast, 220 film has frame number markings on every other frame.
These differences are essential for photographers to consider when selecting the film format that suits their shooting needs, preferences, and equipment capabilities. It is worth noting that while 220 film may offer more frames per roll, its limited availability may make 120 film a more practical and easily accessible choice for most photographers.
FAQ
Can I use 120 films in a 220 back?
Using 120 in a 220 back would cause a greater drag on the film during winding, putting tremendous strain on the components. The film, however, will be in the same location (unless excessive pressure deforms the paper) [11].
Does 220 films still exist?
Yes, 220 films are still being manufactured. However, they are not as popular as they once were and may be difficult to find in some stores.
Now that you know the main difference between 120 and 220 films, it’s time to decide which one is right for you. If you’re looking for high-quality images and don’t mind paying a bit more for them, then 120 films are probably the way to go.
On the other hand, if you’re looking for convenience and want to be able to take more pictures without having to reload your film as often, then 220 films might be a better option. Whichever type of film you choose, make sure you get.
What is the difference between film sizes?
Many of the negative factors listed above exist in both types, but they apply more strongly to one than the other. When it comes to capturing light and shadows, there are distinct technical differences between them that influence the resulting image.
The difference in size between the formats has a significant impact on the finished picture.
There is more grain visible in smaller formats. Large format film delivers greater detail and less grain, but your options are somewhat limited.
How do you shoot a 220 film?
With a 220 film, you need to be very careful when loading and unloading the film.
The process is a bit more complicated than with 120 films, and if you’re not careful, you could easily damage the film. Make sure you follow the instructions that come with your camera carefully and don’t try to force the film into place.
If you’re looking for high-quality images, then 120 films are probably the way to go. On the other hand, if you’re looking for convenience and want to be able to take more pictures without having to reload your film as often, then 220 films might be a better option. Whichever type of film you choose, make sure you get familiar with the loading and unloading process before you head out on your next shoot.
How many shots are in a 120-film roll?
A roll of 120 films contains 10-15 photos, depending on the subject you’re photographing. With the 645 sizes, you have 15 shots per roll. With 6 x 6, you have 12, and with 67, you only have 10 [12].
What size is a 120 film negative?
The first roll of 120 films on which color was introduced by Eastman Kodak in 1901 for the Brownie Box cameras. Initially marketed to consumers for photographs, it later became the preferred format among professionals. The negatives are larger than 35mm at 2 3/4 inches wide and provide increased resolution and sharpness [13].
Will a 120 film fit in a 35mm camera?
35mm film can still be used with your camera set to 120 films, but because it winds slightly more between frames to accommodate for the missing backing paper, your exposures will be farther apart and you’ll get fewer per roll [14].
Can I use 220 film in a camera designed for 120 film?
No, you should not use 220 film in a camera specifically designed for 120 film. The main reason is that cameras made for 120 film have a film-advance system that counts the number of exposures. Since 220 film is longer and doesn’t have a paper backing, the film-advance mechanism would not work accurately with it, leading to overlapping or wasted frames.
Are there any advantages to using 220 film over 120 film?
The primary advantage of using 220 film is that you can get more exposures per roll, making it suitable for photographers who need to take a larger number of shots without changing rolls frequently. However, it’s essential to note that not all cameras support 220 film, and the film itself may be more challenging to find compared to 120 film.
Is there a difference in image quality between 120 and 220 film?
No, there is no difference in image quality between 120 and 220 film inherently. Both film types have the same width and use the same emulsion material, so the quality of the final images is primarily determined by the camera, lens, and photographer’s skill.
Can I respool 220 film onto a 120 film spool for use in compatible cameras?
While technically possible to respool 220 film onto a 120 film spool, it is not recommended. The process requires precision and a light-tight environment to avoid exposing the film prematurely. Additionally, it can be time-consuming and risky, as any mistakes during the respooling process can ruin the film and result in lost shots.
Useful Video: Shooting 120 Film in a 220 Back || Super Film Support
References:
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/120_film
- https://thedarkroom.com/film-formats/220-film
- https://shootitwithfilm.com/35mm-vs-120-choosing-a-film-format
- https://shootitwithfilm.com/35mm-vs-120-choosing-a-film-format
- https://cinemapeoples.com/120mm-vs-220mm
- https://thedarkroom.com/film-formats/220-film
- https://cinemapeoples.com/120mm-vs-220mm/
- https://www.outsidetheshot.com/120-vs-220-film
- https://cinemapeoples.com/120mm-vs-220mm
- https://camerahuzz.com/differences-120mm-vs-220mm-film-compare-review/
- https://www.largeformatphotography.info/forum/showthread.php?7887-Using-120-Film-in-220-back
- https://shootitwithfilm.com/guide-to-medium-format-film-photography
- https://nostalgicmedia.com/pages/old-film-and-camera-formats
- https://pursty.com/can-you-use-35mm-film-in-a-120-camera
I remember the first time I ever shot 220 film. I had just gotten my first camera, a Minolta XG-1, and I wanted to try out all of the different film speeds. I had always heard that 220 was twice as fast as 120, so I decided to give it a try.
I loaded up a roll of 220 and took it out for a spin. To my surprise, the photos turned out great! The colors were brighter and more vibrant, and the shutter speed was twice as fast. I was hooked.
Since then, I’ve always tried to shoot at least some of my photos on 220 film. It’s a great way to get those bright, beautiful colors, and it’s also a lot of fun to use a faster shutter speed.
220 film was the first format I ever shot with as a kid. It was the type of film my dad used in his old Nikon camera, and I loved the idea of capturing photos on something bigger than 35mm. The downside was that 220 film was more expensive and harder to find, so I only got to use it for special occasions.
One summer, my family went on a road trip to visit some relatives in another state. I brought my camera along and took tons of photos during the trip. It was so much fun being able to capture all the memories with my friends and family. And since 220 film produced bigger prints, everyone could see them and share in the excitement.
120 film is a classic film that has been around for years. It’s simple to use and produces great results. I always enjoy using 120 film because it gives me the flexibility to capture stunning photos in both bright and low-light settings.
However, 220 film is a newer type of film that has many benefits over 120 film. For starters, 220 film can hold twice as much images as 120 film. This means that I can shoot more photos before having to reload my camera. Additionally, 220 film tends to produce sharper images than 120 film. This makes it a great choice for capturing important memories or important events.
Overall, I find that 220 film is a superior option to 120 film, but that’s just my personal preference. If you’re new to photography or just looking for an easy-to-use option, then 120 film is probably the best choice for you. But if you’re looking for something with a bit more power and flexibility, then 220 film is the way to go!
I distinctly remember the first time I ever shot photos on 220 film. I was visiting my grandparents in upstate New York and my granddad had a beat-up old camera that he let me borrow. I couldn’t believe how much footage I could fit on a single roll! The photos came out looking really crisp and clear, too.
Compared to 120 film, 220 film has twice as much exposure. This means that you can take twice as many photos on a single roll, which is perfect for anyone who likes to snap lots of pictures. Additionally, 220 film tends to produce sharper images than 120 film, making it a great choice for anyone who wants high-quality prints.
Overall, I think 220 film is a great choice for anyone who wants to take lots of photos without having to worry about running out of film. The extra exposure means that you can capture more memories without having to stop and reload, and the higher image quality means that your prints will look great every time.
120 film is a bit of an old-fashioned medium, but it has its charms. I remember the first time I used 120 film; I was absolutely blown away by the results. The photos had such a rich, creamy texture to them that was simply stunning.
Since then, I’ve continued to use 120 film for all my personal photography projects. It’s just so beautiful and unique, and there’s something really special about holding a physical print in your hands. Sure, 220 film can produce good results as well, but there’s something about 120 that just feels right.
I’ve been shooting photos on 120 film for a while now, and I’ve always loved the look and feel of the images it produces. However, I recently decided to try out 220 film and discovered that there are some significant differences between the two formats.
For starters, 220 film is twice as wide as 120 film, which means that you can fit twice as many photos on a roll. This is great if you’re shooting a lot of photos and don’t want to have to reload your camera as often.
Additionally, 220 film produces much larger prints than 120 film. This is because the images are twice as wide, so they take up twice as much space on the print. This can be either a good or bad thing, depending on your preferences.
Overall, I really like shooting with 220 film. The larger prints are definitely a nice bonus, and I find that I don’t have to reload my camera as often since I can fit more photos on a roll. If you’re looking for a bigger, better way to shoot photos, then I definitely recommend trying out 220 film!
I remember when my parents first got me a 220 film camera. It was a special moment for me, and I couldn’t wait to start taking pictures. At the time, I thought that 220 film cameras were the best thing ever. But now that I’ve used both 120 and 220 film cameras, I can say that there are some definite differences between the two types of cameras.
For one thing, 220 film cameras tend to be a bit bulkier and heavier than 120 film cameras. This can make them a bit more difficult to carry around, especially if you’re traveling. Additionally, 220 film cameras typically have more features than 120 film cameras, which can make them a bit more complicated to use.
Overall, I think that both 120 and 220 film cameras have their advantages and disadvantages. But if I had to choose one, I would definitely go with a 120 film camera. They’re lighter, simpler to use, and still produce great-quality photos.
120 film was the film that I started with. It was the film that my dad had used when he first started photography and it’s what I learned on. It’s a thinner film than 220, which means it can be a little more delicate and often doesn’t have the longevity of a 220 roll. But, I found that I loved the look of 120 film- the colors were richer and the images seemed more timeless to me.
I shot my first roll of 120 in Venice and I just fell in love with the results. The colors were so vibrant and the images felt like they had a certain magic about them. I continued to shoot 120 film for all of my personal projects and eventually started shooting weddings with it as well.
I think the main difference between 120 and 220 is that 220 is a bit more forgiving. If you’re not careful, you can easily overexpose or underexpose a 120 image. But, with 220, you have a bit more leeway to make mistakes. That said, I still prefer the look of 120 film over 220- there’s just something about those rich colors that draws me in every time.
In the early days of photography, 120 film was the standard. This was before digital photography became popular, and people were still using cameras that used film rolls. If you were a photographer in those days, you would have had to use 120 film. However, over time, digital photography became more popular, and 120 film slowly fell out of favor.
Nowadays, 220 film is much more popular than 120 film. This is because it offers more shooting space than 120 film does. If you’re looking for a good quality film to shoot photos with, 220 film is definitely the way to go.
I’m a big fan of shooting film, and I especially love 120 film. It’s the perfect medium for capturing memories and telling stories. With 120 film, you get around 12-15 exposures, which is just enough for most situations. This makes it the perfect choice for everyday shooting, as you don’t have to worry about running out of film halfway through your roll.
I remember the first time I used 120 film. I was shooting portraits of my friends, and I loved the results. The images were sharp and vibrant, and they had a real sense of character that digital photos just can’t match. Plus, there’s something really special about holding a printed photograph in your hand. It’s a tangible reminder of the memories you’ve captured.
I continue to shoot 120 film today, and I’m always amazed by the results. Whether I’m shooting landscapes or portraits, the images always have a unique look and feel that digital photos can’t replicate. If you’re looking for a truly unique photography experience, then I recommend giving 120 film a try.
I vividly remember the day my dad brought home our first 220 format film camera. It was a big black box with a winding lever on top and a viewfinder on the back. My brother and I were excited to try it out and ran around the neighborhood taking photos of everything we could find. The negatives were huge compared to the 35mm film we were used to, but the images were so clear and sharp. We loved the 220 format camera and used it all the time.
A few years later, when digital photography became popular, we sold the 220 camera at a garage sale. I still regret not keeping it, but I’m glad I have some of the photos we took with it. They’re some of my favorite memories.
When I was in middle school, my dad took me to the photography store to buy my first camera. It was a Minolta Maxxum 7 with a kit lens. I was so excited to start taking photos of my friends and family. We also bought a few rolls of 120 film to get started. A few weeks later, we went back to the store to pick up some more film, and I noticed that they only had 220 film left in stock. My dad said that 120 film was being discontinued, so we bought a few rolls of 220 film instead.
I didn’t really understand why 120 film was being discontinued, but I figured that it must be because 220 film produced better photos. I was excited to start using 220 film and see the difference for myself. But after using it for a while, I realized that there wasn’t really a difference. The photos looked just as good on 220 film as they did on 120 film. So why did they discontinue 120 film?
I’m not sure why 120 film was discontinued, but I think it had something to do with the cost of production. 220 film is twice as long as 120 film, so it probably costs more to make it. That’s just speculation, though. I’m not sure if anyone knows for sure why 120 film was discontinued.
But regardless of why it happened, I’m glad that 220 film is still around.
220 film is still being made! I remember when I first started shooting film, 220 was the standard. I would often go to the store and buy a pack of it, without really knowing what it was. It wasn’t until later on that I realized that there was a difference between 120 and 220 film. The main difference, as you mentioned, is the number of exposures each roll can take. With 220 film, you get twice as many shots as you would with 120. This is a great option for those who like to shoot a lot of photos, or for those who don’t want to have to worry about running out of film midway through their roll.
120 film is better for everyday use. It’s cheaper, and it’s easier to find camera models that use it. I’ve been using 120 film for years, and I’ve never had a problem with it.
220 film is better for professional use. It has a higher resolution, and it can be used in more advanced cameras. I’ve used 220 film a few times, and I definitely prefer it over 120 film.
When I was in photography school, we were all required to use Kodak 220 film. It was the only option at the time. I never really questioned it, I just went with the flow. But as I got more into photography, I started to experiment with different types of film. And I quickly realized that 220 film was not for me.
The thing with 220 film is that it’s so thick and heavy. It’s a pain to load into a camera, and it’s not very forgiving if you make a mistake. Plus, it’s expensive. For me, it’s just not worth it. I much prefer 120 film, which is thinner and lighter and much easier to work with.
I know that some photographers swear by 220 film, but for me, it’s just not worth the hassle.
I develop my own 120 film, and I’ve been wanting to try developing 220 film. I’ve heard that it’s a bit more difficult to do, but the results are supposedly worth it. I did some research on the different ways to develop 220 film, and I think I’m going to try the semi-stand method. I’ll let you know how it goes!
120 film aspect ratio is what I grew up shooting with. It is a classic look and feel that I absolutely love. I remember the first time I ever shot on 220 film, it was in my college photography class. We were learning about large format photography and how to use a 4×5 camera. Our professor gave us each a roll of 220 film to shoot with. At the time, I had no idea what 220 film was, but I was excited to try it out. The results were pretty amazing! The larger format created a much more pronounced depth of field and gave the photos a really nice, classic look.
I have never shot 220 film, but I have heard that it is not as readily available as 120 film. This may be due to the fact that it is a more niche format, used mainly by professional photographers. That said, I am sure that if you look hard enough you can find 220 film somewhere.
When I was in film school, there were only 120 film cameras available. So, that’s all we used in class. I never even knew 220 film existed until I started doing some personal research a few years ago. From what I can tell, the main difference between the two is that 220 film can hold more photos than 120 film. Personally, I don’t see a reason to use 220 film over 120 film, since 120 film is already pretty compact and easy to store. But, each photographer has their own preferences, so it really comes down to what you’re most comfortable using.
120 Film negatives are significantly smaller than 220 film negatives. This means that you can get more shots onto a roll of 120 film, and that the negatives themselves are also smaller and easier to store. I find that I take more photos with 120 film than I do with 220, because I don’t feel as limited by the number of shots I have. The downside is that the prints from 120 film are usually not as large as those from 220 film. This isn’t always a bad thing, though, because it means that you can fit more photos onto a page if you’re printing them yourself. Overall, I prefer 120 film for its size and convenience.